Eddie Stobart fined after workers exposed to asbestos
Logistics company Eddie Stobart has been fined after work at one of its sites exposed staff to asbestos. The firm was fined £133,000 for a series of failures that took place while excavation work was carried out at its rail and container freight port in Widnes. Asbestos containing materials (ACMs) were disturbed by the building work, putting staff at risk.
An investigation by the HSE found an asbestos survey had not been carried out, the workers involved hadn’t received any training in relation to asbestos, and Eddie Stobart failed to report the incident correctly. Manchester Magistrates Court heard that in early 2018, an area of the company’s Mersey Multimodal Gateway in Widnes was earmarked for the storage of empty containers. As the ground had become damaged by heavy lift loaders used to move containers, it was decided to scrape away the top layer to reach an older, more level surface below.
This work took place over several months and subsequently the remnants of old buildings containing asbestos were present in the surface material. Underground basement cavities were also found and excavated and then backfilled with rubble. Several workers complained about the dust created by these processes and what it may contain.
An investigation by HSE found an asbestos survey had not been carried out prior to the work beginning to determine if any of the excavated material contained asbestos. The purpose of an asbestos survey is to:
- Find asbestos or ACM and record its form, location and amount.
- Record how accessible it is, its condition, and any surface treatment.
- Ascertain its type, generally by sampling.
A refurbishment / demolition survey is required where the premises, or part of it, needs upgrading, refurbishment or demolition. This type of survey is more intrusive than a management survey and will look beyond the surface materials to identify asbestos that may be present within the fabric of the building.
It aims to make sure that:
- Nobody will be harmed by work on ACM in the premises or equipment.
- Work will be done by the right contractor in the right way.
The survey must locate and identify all ACM before any refurbishment or demolition work begins. It involves intrusive inspection and is targeted to whatever the intended building work involves – the more major the refurbishment, the more intrusive the asbestos survey will be. The area surveyed must be vacated and declared 'fit for reoccupation' afterwards.
A risk assessment had also not been carried out, nor suitable control measures put in place to prevent or reduce exposure to asbestos or prevent the spread of asbestos containing materials from the site. The workers involved in the excavation work hadn’t received any training in relation to asbestos.
It was several months after the work had been completed that testing was carried out and the subsequent survey identified ACMs in the mounds of spoil, as well as scattered around the footprint where the work had taken place.
The company then failed to report the incident under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (RIDDOR) within the ten-day timeframe required.
Eddie Stobart Ltd pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 5 of The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 and Regulation 11(1) of The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012. The company was fined £133,000 and ordered to pay costs of £9,260 on 4 November 2022.
Following the hearing, HSE Inspector Stuart Wood said:
“Asbestos was historically used in countless applications and can be found in a variety of places. The law requires businesses undertaking work in demolition, maintenance or any other work which exposes or is liable to expose employees to asbestos to assume ACMs are present unless you have evidence, such as an asbestos survey to indicate otherwise. The duty to manage asbestos relates to entire premises including yard areas, not just buildings. There is no safe level of exposure to asbestos.”
related content
